I prefer the smaller acting than big histrionics. It's about reacting and looks, which is often underestimated.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Even in the big movies, if the scenes are very big, I'm not fond of them as much as I'm fond of small actor scenes.
Most actors are small, anyway - at least compared to me.
I love the smaller scenes. I love the smaller, slightly more theatrical scenes.
Fortunately, I get asked to play - regardless of how big or small they are - some really interesting people who are part of great stories. So, as an actor, there's really nothing better.
Acting is like any other art form, in that you have the option to go very big or go very small.
What I realized is that it doesn't matter how big or small your film is. The actual filmmaking process, the actual storytelling, it's still the same thing. It's still all about creating characters that you like and creating moments that get you excited or get you tense.
I always prefer the big laugh. That is always the objective, especially with a film like Scary Movie 2.
It's a tough transition really for theater actors to adjust to television or film, and all of these years later, I still have a tendency to play it too big.
I found it more challenging to act in a small scene, especially if it has no dialogue and if it is a close-up with only expressions.
I like doing small parts, because I don't feel I'm that practised in acting. It's like making baby steps towards a bigger goal.
No opposing quotes found.