The thickness of the walls should be sufficient for two armed men to pass each other with ease.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It is possible to provide security against other ills, but as far as death is concerned, we men live in a city without walls.
The men are walking. They are fifty feet apart, for dispersal. Their walk is slow, for they are dead weary, as you can tell even when looking at them from behind. Every line and sag of their bodies speaks their inhuman exhaustion.
I'm concerned about how accessible guns are.
We've got guys who aren't wrapping guys up... No matter how hard you hit them, you've still got to wrap them up.
We need to put undercover security armed people at the curbside of the terminal with the uniform of policemen. We need to protect the terminal. We need to protect the security checkpoint, the gate, the aircraft, the perimeter.
Men and women are like two feet; they can help each other get ahead.
Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?
It is not enough just to get your forces from A to B - you have to keep them fed and watered as they go. The art of movement, therefore, is one of the most complex and vital that any commander must master if he is going to win.
Fences and walls can be effective and even soothing, at least for those who build them.
One man is not enough.
No opposing quotes found.