I will repeat again that females are the symbols of nonviolence. Another thing I would say is that a female is more compromising. A female can talk with anyone easily.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Until the masculine role is humanized, women will tend to be much better at solving dangerous conflicts.
We like to think of women as peacemakers, not purveyors of violence.
Women are called upon to defend every bit of progress we have made against particularly virulent attack. But we must also hold out a vision, put forth a positive agenda of what women need and want and then move forward toward that dream.
The voice of women has a special role and a special soul force in the struggle for a nonviolent world.
Men are distinguished from women by their commitment to do violence rather than to be victimized by it.
When women participate in peace-making and peace-keeping, we are all safer and more secure.
The more potent, unasked question is how society at large reacts to eager, voluntary violence by females, and to the growing evidence that women can be just as aggressive as men.
The denial of female aggression is a destructive myth. It robs an entire gender of a significant spectrum of power, leaving women less than equal with men and effectively keeping them 'in their place' and under control.
All leaders, male or female, innately possess feminine qualities like empathy, candor and vulnerability - the difference lies in which leaders choose to suppress those qualities, and which choose to leverage them as strengths.
Women are not inherently passive or peaceful.