There are both things in international law: the principle of territorial integrity and right to self-determination.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I had been brought up in the law and had this sort of instinct that international law operates and was there to protect principles and not to be the plaything of power and might - which I now know, of course, to be an absolute nonsense. International law should be spelled l-o-r-e.
The security of which we speak is to be attained by the development of international law through an international organization based on the principles of law and justice.
Insofar as international law is observed, it provides us with stability and order and with a means of predicting the behavior of those with whom we have reciprocal legal obligations.
Law is the essential foundation of stability and order both within societies and in international relations.
In the first place, when there is a policy of intentional aggression, inspired by a desire to get possession of the territory or the trade of another country, right or wrong, a pretext is always sought.
If you say that your national law allows you to do something, it is fine as long as you do this inside your own territory. As long as you go international, you really have to be sure that there is an international law which you respect and which you follow.
Claims of right and insistence upon obligations may depend upon treaty stipulations, or upon the rules of international law, or upon the sense of natural justice applied to the circumstances of a particular case, or upon disputed facts.
You have to accept the rule of law, even when it's inconvenient, if you're going to be a country that bides by the rule of law.
International institutions are composed of governments. Governments control their own military forces and police.
Laws are the sovereigns of sovereigns.