I'm not in favor of just taking short-term isolated situations and depleting our resources to keep our climate just the way it is today.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We unfortunately already live on a planet where the climate has changed and will continue to change no matter what we do now. We're playing a game of making the problem less bad rather than preventing it.
If you really accept that global warming puts the world at risk, then you think you would be open to any solution that could undo it.
On climate change, we often don't fully appreciate that it is a problem. We think it is a problem waiting to happen.
If we do not change our negative habits toward climate change, we can count on worldwide disruptions in food production, resulting in mass migration, refugee crises and increased conflict over scarce natural resources like water and farm land. This is a recipe for major security problems.
The second thing is, if you want to do something about global warming, you have to think much more long-term. There is something wrong with saying we should start using renewables now, while they are still incredibly expensive.
The idea that human beings have taken a few steps closer toward asserting control over the Earth's climate is likely to strike you as a really bad idea.
I don't think we can do anything about controlling what our climate is.
The idea that we have the capacity to change or stop the climate, I'm just skeptical.
Nature is not simply a technical or economical resource, and human beings are not mere numbers. To suggest that one can somehow align all the squabbling institutions of science, environmental management, government and diplomacy in an alliance of convenience to regulate the global climate seems to me optimistic.
We should learn to live more with our climate and rely less on electricity to alter our climate.
No opposing quotes found.