Sometimes art is ahead of revolution.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Art is either plagiarism or revolution.
The differences between revolution in art and revolution in politics are enormous. Revolution in art lies not in the will to destroy but in the revelation of what has already been destroyed. Art kills only the dead.
I think that art is supposed to be ahead of the times.
Art is the triumph over chaos.
Our art, in a sense, is quite revolutionary.
The modern tradition is the tradition of revolt. The French Revolution is still our model today: history is violent change, and this change goes by the name of progress. I do not know whether these notions really apply to art.
It's easier to make art for a society at a certain point in time with an understanding of what's going on.
Like art, revolutions come from combining what exists into what has never existed before.
Art, in itself, is an attempt to bring order out of chaos.
In art there are only fast or slow developments. Essentially it is a matter of evolution, not revolution.