I think there are different ways of being rigorous, and I am asking people to be as rigorous in their pleasure as in their criticism.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I think the most effective forms of critique are ones that establish a common ground for people to occupy, and then appeal to the best nature of people on that common ground.
We are not a court - not a judge or jury at work - but we've tried to apply the highest possible standards of rigorous analysis to the evidence where we make a criticism.
I have friends who will critique me much harder than any review.
You can learn a lot from criticism if you can take what's constructive out of it. If you read a review that starts with, 'This person is an idiot; who do they think they are?', you're not going to learn anything from that.
I always take criticism as a challenge. It's the way I've always looked at it.
Praise and criticism seem to me to operate exactly on the same level. If you get a great review, it's really thrilling for about ten minutes. If you get a bad review, it's really crushing for ten minutes. Either way, you go on.
I don't tend to offer up a critique unless I have a clearly formulated alternative, because there's nothing worse than people on a set or any kind of artistic life who critique something but who don't have anything to offer.
I like criticism. It makes you strong.
Few people have the wisdom to prefer the criticism that would do them good, to the praise that deceives them.
I can take criticisms but not compliments.