Anyone can make an article longer; the skill is keeping it tight and lean.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The one problem with the Internet for journalists who like doing long form is that any story that's going to involve 16 screens on the web page... that's asking a lot of people.
I'm pretty disciplined to keep the momentum of a story going by writing everyday, even if it's only a couple paragraphs or a page or two.
Readers, like writers, are essentially amoral. Arm's length will never do. We want to get closer.
I think people seem to want to read pieces that are shorter but not as short as the pieces they can read in small bites on the Internet. It may be that the sort of long essays are hitting a sweet spot between the tiny morsels online and the full-length book.
My job as an author is to tell the story in the best way possible, to make it flow seamlessly and get the reader to keep turning the page.
When you're writing for newspapers you have all these parameters. You can't swear, you have to use short paragraphs, all that. If you stay within those parameters, you have lots of freedom because you're writing for the next day.
My writing day has grown shorter as I've aged, although it seems to produce the same number of pages.
It's gonna be short if it's news; put it at the top. Style's not an issue, just make it news.
Articles themselves are condensed to narrow columns of text across 5, 6, 7 pages, and ads that are really distracting for the reader, so it's not a pleasant experience to 'curl up' with a good website.
I like getting 'Times' articles online. But the actual paper just has too many words.