It is better for me to serve a charity as an actor or a voice, rather than at a luncheon being just a celebrity.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Celebrity never really served me that well; it serves other people well.
My feeling is, if you're going to be called a celebrity, you might as well use it for some good. It's better to testify for school lunches in front of Congress than get drunk in a bar somewhere and misbehave.
There are three things being a celebrity is good for: raising money for charity, dinner reservations and tee times.
I think there is a difference between being a celebrity and being an actor.
I'm a professional actor, not a celebrity.
The toughest thing about being a celebrity, I suppose, is being polite when I don't want to be.
I've always thought of myself as a role model even before being a 'celebrity.' I've always been doing charity work and volunteering in the community since I was 8, so when you do that, I think you just assume that role when you put yourself out there.
When you have a celebrity who is willing to shine his personal spotlight on the non-profit and can also speak articulately about the mission, that's really the best of both worlds.
I've never considered myself a celebrity or even part of the entertainment business. I'm a cooking teacher.
I want to be part of a different kind of celebrity, one that thinks not just about charity but policy.