I have no personal vendetta against Clarence Thomas. I seek only to provide the committee with information which it may regard as relevant.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
In July of 1983, I left Washington, DC area and have had minimal contact with Judge Clarence Thomas since.
I spent my time trying to understand grand jury procedure - a topic about which I never before had the slightest interest.
As a result of this article, I was invited to testify in the Senate Judiciary Committee on privacy law.
Justice Scalia is predictable. He can be counted on to come down with a conservative opinion, and generally, to bring Justice Clarence Thomas with him.
I regard myself as a grand juror waiting to hear the evidence from the prosecutor, the Judiciary Committee. I'm diametrically opposed to Nixon and everything he stands for, but I want to see the evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors first.
The values of confidentiality of matters occurring before the grand jury is very important.
My concern was whether I could do the job of a justice well enough to convince the nation that my appointment was the right move.
If a liberal were to attack Justice Clarence Thomas on the grounds that he's black, we would all go crazy.
I have been approached to consider an appointment to the Virginia Supreme Court. I am humbled and honored to be considered for such a position, but it is not something that my wife and I have previously contemplated.
I have the highest possible regard for the district attorneys in the State of New York.
No opposing quotes found.