When you apply computer science and machine learning to areas that haven't had any innovation in 50 years, you can make rapid advances that seem really incredible.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
In fact what I would like to see is thousands of computer scientists let loose to do whatever they want. That's what really advances the field.
Computers themselves, and software yet to be developed, will revolutionize the way we learn.
Look at what Silicon Valley has done - the advance of computers.
Software tends not to kill people, and so we accept incredibly fast innovation loops because the consequences are tolerable and the results are astonishing.
Advances in technology will continue to reach far into every sector of our economy. Future job and economic growth in industry, defense, transportation, agriculture, health care, and life sciences is directly related to scientific advancement.
Machine learning is the science of getting computers to learn without being explicitly programmed.
There is huge demand for artificial intelligence technologies.
Ultimately, I hypothesize that technology will one day be able to recreate a realistic representation of us as a result of the plethora of content we're creating converging with other advances in machine learning, robotics and large-scale data mining.
The pace of innovation may slow down or speed up depending on the appetite in the public markets, but the constant progress of technology doesn't really ever stop. There's always opportunities for new ideas and creative people to go build great things. I'm always interested in learning about those kinds of opportunities.
I think computer science, by and large, is still stuck in the Modern age.
No opposing quotes found.