Quote

Fracking opens up vast tracts of the U.S. to exploitation by gas drillers. There's enough energy under our feet to last us for decades, maybe centuries.

Fracking kills, and it doesn't just kill us. It kills the land, nature and, eventually, the whole world.

Environmentalists should like fracking for its relative cleanliness. But they don't. They have made a bugaboo out of the chemicals in fracking fluids, which supposedly can leach into groundwater sources. I'm convinced they're dead wrong. Ultimately, good technology with a cost advantage will win out over paranoia.

Fracking is an incredible risk to the human race, I don't know why they even thought of doing it.

How do we take the bad out of fracking? How do you contain the water? How do we make a profit out of that? Get there early.

Fracking is doable if there's full disclosure of all chemicals used. Secondly, science dictates the policy rather than politics. Third, there's collaboration between environmental groups and the natural gas industry.

Fracking has been a real technological change that has caused great innovation in our business, and we've had the benefit of very low gas prices for our customers as a result of that.

I'm not a scientist. If there is a risk to our environment, there will be no fracking.

A lot of the basic research that helped us figure out fracking came from the federal government.

We've been hydraulically fracturing wells in large numbers since the 1960s, first developed in 1940.