And yes, there's a simplicity to writing books because you're not a member of a team, so you make all the decisions yourself instead of deferring to a committee.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
It's true that I have spoken about doing a book before, but then everyone you speak to is planning to write a book.
The writer's job is to let the books speak for themselves eventually.
When you write a book for publication, you're writing it for other people to read.
We can write the book on how to run a successful write-in campaign for the United States Senate.
I think the reason working-class people don't write books is because they are encouraged to believe that only certain people are permitted to write books.
The whole purpose of writing a book is to be understood - if other people write about you, they try to guess why you did things, or they hear things from other people.
Even though I may not intend it when I set out to write the book, these places just emerge as major players in what I'm doing, almost as if they are insisting on it.
Anyone can write one book: even politicians do it. Starting a second book reveals an intention to be a professional writer.
Writing books can be very individual - one might strike you as helpful that someone else found useless, or that you might not have appreciated at some other time in your life.
No matter how well a person writes, a successful book is a team effort involving many, many people.