I seldom play in a trio, but acoustic music is likely to be lighter, quicker, and quieter.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
A lot of musicians have a tough time hearing what we're doing in a trio format.
As an improviser I'm now pretty comfortable with trios, so I'm thinking of working up to quartets.
I'd say it's harder to play with an acoustic guitar strapped over your shoulder for a few hundred people than it is to play in front of thousands with an entire bombastic band behind you.
And then as we played more and more as a trio, it became more and more of a situation where we realized we really knew how to use the fourth member of the group - that space. The thing about the trio is that it's the biggest sound you can have with the smallest unit.
I say to string players in small chamber orchestras, 'it's always easy to become a passenger on the journey in sound, just adding volume to the whole. But if you play in an individual way, it makes the difference between good and great sound in an orchestra.'
I play the guitar and the piano and have a group of guys who I play with. They're uber talented.
I mean, I can sit down with a guitar, and in fact, we do two, three songs with just guitar and percussion.
Of course, we also have to play in concert halls. This is our dream when you are a musician - to play in a good, comfortable hall with a wonderful acoustic.
I'm an acoustical person.
We tune differently, and we use some tricks. There's just the two of us for much of a concert, so we want a big sound. We do use some guitar effects, distortion and delay. Playing cello with distortion sounds so good.
No opposing quotes found.