If I allow journalists to describe a collection and they make mistakes, I'm upset, because the retractions are never noticed.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Journalists do not like to report on uncertainties. They would almost rather be wrong than ambiguous.
The best way of dealing with the press, customers, and critics is to come clean when things go wrong and admit when you make a mistake. We are humans, and no one expects us to be perfect.
When journalists forget that our job is to question and annoy those in power, there can be huge consequences.
It's always unfortunate when something gets misreported and the facts are not clear.
Keep in mind that when public figures get in trouble for something they said, it is usually not because they misspoke, but because they accidentally told the truth.
I think the media are so hypocritical a lot of the time in the way they chastise something just so that they can print it again.
That's why editors and publishers will never be obsolete: a reader wants someone with taste and authority to point them in the direction of the good stuff, and to keep the awful stuff away from their door.
Accuracy to a newspaper is what virtue is to a lady; but a newspaper can always print a retraction.
Once journalists have been rifling through your dustbins, you do try and keep them at arms' length.
As journalists, because you don't carry a gun, you sort of become this observer.
No opposing quotes found.