We ought to ban hunting, I suggest, if there isn't a purpose other than sport and fun. That should be against the law. It's time now.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
If you live in the countryside, you understand that hunting isn't just for toffs. It's for the farmers. It's for everyone's enjoyment.
Anyone who thinks hunters are just 'bloodthirsty morons' hasn't looked into hunting. If you wait through long, cold hours in the November woods with a bow in your hands hoping a buck will show, or if you spend days walking in the African bush trailing Cape buffalo while listening to lions roar, you're sure to learn hunting isn't about killing.
I'm 100 percent behind the Second Amendment. I believe it's not just a hunting right. It's a right for everyone to carry their weapons.
This isn't about deer hunting. The Second Amendment is about our right to keep and bear arms to defend ourselves.
We do not need to eat animals, wear animals, or use animals for entertainment purposes, and our only defense of these uses is our pleasure, amusement, and convenience.
There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.
I haven't been hunting for years. It is just a tradition I grew up with.
I don't oppose hunting in any way, shape or form. If that's what you enjoy doing, you are free to do it.
No one is more keen than me to see the Hunting Act repealed, because I believe in the management of wildlife.
Hunting is not a sport. In a sport, both sides should know they're in the game.