The original 'Star Trek' series is the classic one. Its successor, 'The Next Generation,' is less lovable, but at its best, it's smarter.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I have an illogical affinity for 'Star Trek: The Next Generation.'
I've been a huge fan of virtually every incarnation and spin-off of the 'Star Trek' franchise (don't get me started on 'Voyager,' though), but there's something about the purity of the original series that really appeals to me.
When you're a kid, 'Star Trek' is a slower burn. It's funny, it's entertaining, but it also has a maturity about it - which is its universal appeal, I think.
I may have one more 'Star Trek' novel in me, but it would be in the old universe, not the new one.
I have always been a fan of 'Star Trek.' I love Gene Roddenberry's vision of the future.
I am a classic 'Star Trek' fanatic.
'Star Trek' was an attempt to say humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in lifeforms.
I grew up with 'Star Wars,' not 'Star Trek.'
I fell in love with 'Star Trek' after J. J. Abrams's movie. I'm so into that.
'The Next Generation' was a lot of fun for a while, and then it wasn't a lot of fun. The reason it wasn't a lot of fun was that this one was going to be a guaranteed hit. The original 'Star Trek' was never a guaranteed hit.