No company is preferable to bad. We are more apt to catch the vices of others than virtues, as disease is far more contagious than health.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
What is good for you is not necessarily good for the company, and vice versa.
Bad company is as instructive as licentiousness. One makes up for the loss of one's innocence with the loss of one's prejudices.
Yes. I'm a doctor, an epidemiologist, and lots of my professional colleagues flip back and forth between industry and medical roles. I know them; they are not bad people. But it is possible for good people in bad systems to do things that inflict enormous harm.
You can't have a healthy society unless you have healthy companies that are making a profit, that are employing people and that are growing.
More company increases happiness, but does not lighten or diminish misery.
People say you've got to be OK with your own company, but tell me why?
If a company is not doing well, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is not a good company.
We are more prone to generalize the bad than the good. We assume that the bad is more potent and contagious.
If workers are more insecure, that's very 'healthy' for the society, because if workers are insecure, they won't ask for wages, they won't go on strike, they won't call for benefits; they'll serve the masters gladly and passively. And that's optimal for corporations' economic health.
There is so much bad manners and oafishness in large corporations.
No opposing quotes found.