As a writer, or as a filmmaker, you have to present yourself, and part of what yourself is is what you're interested in, or what you think is funny, or what you think is sad, or what you think is horrible.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I've always considered myself a filmmaker who writes stuff for himself to do.
I really think of myself just as a filmmaker.
It's funny: as a director, there are movies you make because you're passionate about getting your vision across, and you know that you're vision is different than anybody else. In those cases, you take the plunge, and it works, or it doesn't. You make the stylistic choices based on how you feel about the material.
There's got to be something you want to tell and that's the engine which spurs all of the work you have to do in order to create the story, but you have to love some sort of nugget of what you're telling to be a filmmaker.
As an artist, there's so many categories that you're put into, that there are so many things that I'm about that I've never explored as an artist on film. I don't see myself in so many characters in film.
I make my films because I'm affected by a situation, by something that makes me want to reflect on it, that lends itself to an artistic reflection. I always aim to look directly at what I'm dealing with. I think it's a task of dramatic art to confront us with things that in the entertainment industry are usually swept under the rug.
When you aren't doing too many films, people find other things to write about you.
I don't actually sit down and write, but I just have a lot of different ideas about films and making movies.
I think, as a filmmaker, it's important to be honest with yourself at all times in terms of what's working and what's not.
If you want to tell stories, be a writer, not a filmmaker.