I've been taking my time now between projects looking for stuff that has a little bit more substance, that isn't surface. Some of the films that I've done in the past really were surface.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I've never seen a surface that I think is more seductive in image making.
I love films for the fact that it is like working under a microscope. It is sort of like a laboratory.
I like naturally occurring film grain, and what happens to film when it's under- and over-exposed.
Well, actually I don't care what surface I'm playing on.
I just have more fun when I get to try new things - and the action film genre has kind of painted itself into a corner, copied itself so many times and it has basically run out of bad buys.
The surface is all you get of me.
I'm really into acquiring film paraphernalia - that's my hobby. I love old movie posters, cameras and film reels.
I'm working in a form of cinema that can be described, and has been described, as a diaristic form of cinema. In other words, with material from my own life. I walk through life with my camera, and occasionally I film. I never think about scripts, never think about films, making films.
After 1980, you never heard reference to space again. Surface, the most convincing evidence of the descent into materialism, became the focus of design. Space disappeared.
Before I discovered moviemaking, I hadn't found anything where I could kind of galvanize or meld all of the things that I wanted to do.
No opposing quotes found.