I guess NBC must have noticed that one of my main staples is social media. So, when they approached me for 'The Voice,' I thought, 'Why not be the first one to do it?'
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I didn't get into acting to be a public service announcer or an advocate and yet, by virtue of this show and how we handle the subject matter that we've been given, that's kind of how it's evolved in certain ways.
I don't like it when celebrities get voice work. But then again, if I was the producer, I wouldn't want a bunch of no-names doing my show and have to worry about word-of-mouth. I see both sides of the story.
You can choose to listen to one end of the spectrum or the other on Twitter, just like you can on television. But hopefully what we've done is given a voice to that broad middle ground.
One of the hardest things to do when you launch a channel is find a voice.
People want to have a voice and a say in what is news.
The paparazzi and the press have given me a voice. No matter how I got the voice, it's there.
You cannot have the media so close to you that it becomes your voice. This is no good because it becomes too extreme, and people will resent it.
I am all for everyone having a voice; I just don't think everyone has earned the microphone. And that's what the Internet has done.
I haven't done a lot of voice work, but I know that a lot of shows will just bring in the actors individually, and they will just do what is on the paper. You miss out on that connection of having everyone there.
It's a dialogue, not a monologue, and some people don't understand that. Social media is more like a telephone than a television.
No opposing quotes found.