Well, we can't say any more than we can say there is no god, there is no afterlife. We can only say there is no persuasive evidence for or argument for it.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Believing that there is no God does not mean that there isn't one.
I happen to believe that there is an afterlife.
We have seen that no religion stands on the basis of things known; none bounds its horizon within the field of human observation; and, therefore, as it can never present us with indisputable facts, so must it ever be at once a source of error and contention.
It's just as idiotic to say there is no life after death as it is to say there is one.
Religion is not going to come up with any new arguments.
To a certain extent I am taking a leap of faith. I'm adding up the evidence on either side, and I'm seeing the evidence of there not being a God is overwhelming compared to the evidence for there being a God.
The belief that there are other life forms in the universe is a matter of faith. There is not a single shred of evidence for any other life forms, and in forty years of searching, none has been discovered. There is absolutely no evidentiary reason to maintain this belief.
If God exists, what objection can he have to saying so?
I don't believe in an afterlife.
Nobody talks so constantly about God as those who insist that there is no God.