I think the materialist conception of history is valid.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I think... the history of civilization is an attempt to codify, classify and categorize aspects of human nature that hardly lend themselves to that process.
History is, of course, a made thing. It does not exist by itself in anything like a recognizable form.
Can't disagree with the need for a grasp of history.
History is an endless repetition of the wrong way of living.
I've always been intrigued by the way history works, the way we decide what is mentioned.
I see history as really cyclical in terms of the intense idealism, and the desire to create a better life outside of societal norms.
History is more or less bunk.
History is so subjective. The teller of it determines it.
History is a vision of God's creation on the move.
The so-called 'materialistic conception of history,' with the crude elements of genius of the early form which appeared, for instance, in the 'Communist Manifesto,' still prevails only in the minds of laymen and dilettantes.