Censorship, like charity, should begin at home, but, unlike charity, it should end there.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Charity should begin at home, but should not stay there.
Charity begins at home, but should not end there.
My argument is that charity does indeed start at home, but it doesn't stop there.
I think the best thing in cases of censorship or things like this is to get as much media as possible.
Censorship is advertising paid by the government.
These censorship people think something is going to promote behavior in people.
Censorship is never over for those who have experienced it. It is a brand on the imagination that affects the individual who has suffered it, forever.
Submitting to censorship is to enter the seductive world of 'The Giver': the world where there are no bad words and no bad deeds. But it is also the world where choice has been taken away and reality distorted. And that is the most dangerous world of all.
I worry about censorship in many parts of the world.
No government ought to be without censors; and where the press is free no one ever will.