Experts often possess more data than judgment.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Judgment is more than skill. It sets forth on intellectual seas beyond the shores of hard indisputable factual information.
An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less.
And the user may have a higher comfort level deciding what information to provide rather than worrying about what inferences might be made from what they've gathered.
The real difference between a man's scientific judgments about himself and the judgment of others about him is he has added sources of knowledge.
The people I go after are the false experts, those who do not accept the limits of their knowledge.
Policymakers have to make judgments based on the best intelligence they get.
An expert is someone who has succeeded in making decisions and judgements simpler through knowing what to pay attention to and what to ignore.
There are domains in which expertise is not possible. Stock picking is a good example. And in long-term political strategic forecasting, it's been shown that experts are just not better than a dice-throwing monkey.
An expert is someone who knows a lot about the past.
An expert gives an objective view. He gives his own view.