The process of writing 'The Innovator's Dilemma' entailed the developing a new theory. My colleagues, students and I have been improving that theory, and adding others to it, since that time.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
So, it's a very, you know - maybe we're wrong in - you know, we go around thinking the innovator is the person who's first to kind of conceive of something. And maybe the innovation process continues down the line to the second and the third and the fourth entrant into a field.
I believe in being an innovator.
What is interesting to me is to find ways to work with early-stage innovators to build from the edge and work on tomorrow's ideas.
The world needs a better understanding of how to encourage innovation. And innovators need to get better at it. Sign me up.
You look at any industry - you're not innovating unless people are questioning it. If you're innovating, you're doing something nobody's done before, which means you're re-writing rules, resetting boundaries, re-creating systems. And that means the traditional industry is going to question it.
At the point that an idea approaches perfection, fashion and expectations surge ahead, leaving the innovator with considerable room to find further improvements.
When you need to innovate, you need collaboration.
I think you always have to be innovating and adapting and improving. You can't stay the same.
Every once in a while, a new technology, an old problem, and a big idea turn into an innovation.
Innovation comes out of great human ingenuity and very personal passions.
No opposing quotes found.