We're a country of laws and rules, and the Supreme Court has ruled that life forms are patentable entities.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Our laws need to reflect the evolution of technology and the changing expectations of American society. This is why the Constitution is often called a 'living' document.
The Life at Conception Act legislatively declares what most Americans believe and what science has long known - that human life begins at the moment of conception and, therefore, is entitled to legal protection from that point forward.
Life is composed of different inventions.
What I have advocated is that we pass law in this country that says all human life at every stage of its development is worthy of protection. In fact, I think that law already exists. It is called the Constitution of the United States.
The business of the law is to make sense of the confusion of what we call human life - to reduce it to order but at the same time to give it possibility, scope, even dignity.
The Constitution says that the right to life of the unborn is protected and given equal rights as the life of the mother.
Life must be considered sui generis; it is not a form of energy, nor can it be expressed in terms of something else.
Life, especially in America, is ruled by corporations.
You can't say 'because we decide we're different then we need a different set of laws.'
I'm a lawyer. The right to life is important.
No opposing quotes found.