When any organizational entity expands beyond 21 members, the real power will be in some smaller body.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
The franchise itself gives no real power, unless accompanied by the right on the part of all the possessors of it to elect something like an equal number of representatives.
The organizational architecture is really that a centipede walks on hundred legs and one or two don't count. So if I lose one or two legs, the process will go on, the organization will go on, the growth will go on.
Greater economic power will be in the hands of too few.
Future companies will be smaller and more nimble.
Large organization is loose organization. Nay, it would be almost as true to say that organization is always disorganization.
The reality is institutions that invest in high growth have offices globally and talk across offices.
But the more an organization succeeds and prospers, the more it is likely to be diverted from its original ideals, principles and purposes.
Growth makes so many dimensions of management easier. It's when growth stops that things get tough.
Indeed there are powers in the small child that are far greater than is generally realized, because it is in this period that the construction, the building-up, of man takes place, for at birth, psychically speaking, there is nothing at all - zero!
To properly reflect the changes of the world and of the UN, with its growing number of member states, we would like to see an enlargement of the SC that gives room for new members, not least developing countries.