Women have traditionally deferred to the judgment of men although often while intimating a sensibility of their own which is at variance with that judgment.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Men are often biased in their judgment on account of their sympathy and their interests.
Although it has been said by men of more wit than wisdom, and perhaps more malice than either, that women are naturally incapable of acting prudently, or that they are necessarily determined to folly, I must by no means grant it.
Perhaps women have always been in closer contact with reality than men: it would seem to be the just recompense for being deprived of idealism.
I think women have long been defined by their roles as procreators and wives, and we're expected to serve, take care of, say 'Yes,' and not ruffle any feathers. Women, in particular, are sometimes not allowed to consider who they are outside of the roles that they play.
I think it's fair to say that women have a different level of intuitiveness that allows them to perhaps handle situations a little bit different.
We often see literature about women that impair and immerse the women themselves, such as when women are portrayed as objects of consumerism.
If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice, or representation.
I know the disposition of women: when you will, they won't; when you won't, they set their hearts upon you of their own inclination.
Men tend to feel threatened; women tend to feel guilty.
Too often the great decisions are originated and given form in bodies made up wholly of men, or so completely dominated by them that whatever of special value women have to offer is shunted aside without expression.