The way Yes works is when we have a new member come in, as in Jon Davison, it's appropriate that we see what differences we can get out of a new contributing member in order to keep Yes interesting.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I wouldn't object to working with any former member of Yes, really.
I think partly the problem with Yes - and I've had this discussion with people from the Hall of Fame in the past - is that it's going to be difficult to decide how many of the members of Yes you're gonna put in it and how many you're not because of the extensive membership of the band through the years.
I always watched the show thinking, 'Wouldn't it be great to be a member?', but I never thought it would happen.
We have to ask ourselves, is it really right that the E.U. should just continue to expand, conferring upon all new member states all the rights of membership?
We all know that change is inevitable. It provides us with a challenge and an opportunity to grow and improve and to attract new members with new ideas.
You don't want a whole bunch of yes people around you.
'Yes' is a far more potent word than 'no' in American politics. By adopting the positions which animate the political agenda for the other side, one can disarm them and leave them sputtering with nothing to say.
The art of leadership is saying no, not saying yes. It is very easy to say yes.
Breaking accepted rules does bring people together.
The fact I've been in every lineup of Yes has been more by default than design.
No opposing quotes found.