I think intensity is one thing, and gore is another.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Gore will not win a popularity contest, he will not win a personality contest, but he can win an idealogical battle, and he can win a battle of experience.
It doesn't matter the amount of gore, the amount of shocks that you can have in a movie if the movie's not entertaining, if the story's not entertaining.
Intensity is so much more becoming in the young.
Al Gore's performances could be a case study in abnormal-psychology classes.
I think that the reason Clinton chose Gore was that he was an example of what Clinton was like. He was kind of almost like the yellow magic marker that you use to highlight the text so that you can really remember what are the most salient features of it.
If you want to be angry at Gore, be angry at him for not fighting harder in Florida.
Al Gore clearly has the vision... it's a much better vision than that of George W. Bush.
I think Clinton fatigue was a real thing. It's just hard to get comfortable with Gore - it was hard for him to project who he is, the person people know in private.
It's unbelievable, there's a book out attacking Gore, when he's the most unfortunate loser in political history.
Bill Gore from Goretex was a very strong influence because he was one of the first larger companies to experiment with freedom in the workplace.
No opposing quotes found.