When we deal with questions relating to principles of law and their applications, we do not suddenly rise into a stratosphere of icy certainty.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
We have no right to assume that any physical laws exist, or if they have existed up until now, that they will continue to exist in a similar manner in the future.
Law and order in our communities doesn't arise spontaneously.
Every fundamental law has exceptions. But you still need the law or else all you have is observations that don't make sense. And that's not science. That's just taking notes.
The establishment of a law, moreover, does not take place when the first thought of it takes form, or even when its significance is recognised, but only when it has been confirmed by the results of the experiment.
The law is agnostic about truth.
No great idea in its beginning can ever be within the law. How can it be within the law? The law is stationary. The law is fixed. The law is a chariot wheel which binds us all regardless of conditions or place or time.
We want laws to be applied predictably.
Historically courts in this country have been insulated. We do not look beyond our borders for precedents.
Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered.
Law is mind without reason.