My sense is that the wonderful technology that we have to visualize the inside of the body often leaves physicians feeling that the exam is a waste of time and so they may shortchange the ritual.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Patients know in a heartbeat if they're getting a clumsy exam.
Great success in examinations does naturally not as a rule go with originality of thought.
There's a great deal of suspicion and misunderstanding about IT among practicing doctors. One hears things like, 'I don't want to be turned into a data entry clerk, and I don't want some machine between me and my patients.'
Examinations are formidable even to the best prepared, for the greatest fool may ask more than the wisest man can answer.
One has a greater sense of degradation after an interview with a doctor than from any human experience.
I would welcome processes that eliminate the need for doctors. We bottle-neck things around doctors, and it's not a good way of doing things.
Down through the centuries, this trick has been tried by various establishments throughout the world. They force people to get involved in the kind of examination that has only one aim and that is to stamp out dissent.
Doctors are human; they make mistakes, and you have to stay on top of them. You have to ask the second question, the third question, the follow-up to the fourth question.
Modern medicine uses imaging 'windows' such as magnetic resonance imaging scanners to bring into view otherwise unseen vital information that skilled physicians can use for the benefit of their patients.
The purpose of technology is not to confuse the brain but to serve the body.
No opposing quotes found.