It is infinitely better to transplant a heart than to bury it to be devoured by worms.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
The brain isn't like the heart. They learned how to transplant a heart. The brain is more complex.
The artificial heart is very effective as a bridge to transplant, but the number of people that can be saved with human hearts is limited. A perfect artificial heart could save many more patients.
Let my body be delivered to the earth without attention to the place where it lies; nothing should be associated with my dusty remains. Shame on him who draws any attention to a rotted flesh that is already no longer mine: he is worshipping the worms nibbling it.
We don't have enough solid organs for transplantation; not enough kidneys, livers, hearts, lungs. When you get a liver and you have three people who need it, who should get it? We tried to come up with an ethically defensible answer. Because we have to choose.
The difficulty of finding organs suitable for transplantation on man must be met.
The human heart dares not stay away too long from that which hurt it most. There is a return journey to anguish that few of us are released from making.
I believe that the truest parts of people can be buried, and for many different reasons.
Not only is natural burial by far the most ecologically sound way to perish, it doubles down on the fear of fragmentation and loss of control. Making the choice to be naturally buried says, 'Not only am I aware that I'm a helpless, fragmented mass of organic matter, I celebrate it. Vive la decay!'
To say what you feel is to dig your own grave.
I am overjoyed that I do not need a heart transplant at this time.