Personally, I would say the 'master' of this whole thing is fate... Whoever is on the playing field is fair game, and it's up to them to avoid being used.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
No man is good enough to be another's master.
One can be the master of what one does, but never of what one feels.
I wouldn't describe myself as a master of anything.
Only one who devotes himself to a cause with his whole strength and soul can be a true master. For this reason mastery demands all of a person.
The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other. Our children see this, and learn to imitate it.
There's a magic that comes from playing entirely to who you are. I've got my specialist subject - in the Mastermind sense - and I wouldn't change it, or who I am.
Some single mind must be master, else there will be no agreement in anything.
In my opinion, a master is morally obliged to seize every sort of opportunity and to try to solve the problems of the position without fear of some simplifications.
With these men and women who work-for the cause with all their hearts, with cool heads and skilled hands we will master every fate.
How a person masters his fate is more important than what his fate is.