If you compromise in any kind of movement or any kind of wave of revolution, if you sort of play the game, things are gonna change far more slowly than you need them to.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Some say that I should settle down, go slower and not push so hard, so quickly for such transformational change. To them, I say that you misunderstand the size of the problems we face, the strength of the status quo and the urgency of the people's desire for change.
When the fabric of society is so rigid that it cannot change quickly enough, adjustments are achieved by social unrest and revolutions.
I would love nothing more than compromise. But I would say to you that compromise that's not a solution is a waste of time.
If you don't change and mix things up, you're going to get run over. One of the things we preach is change, change, change.
I believe it's less risky long-term to embrace change.
Change is inevitable. Things absolutely cannot stay the same. The type of change we invoke is up to each and every one of us.
Compromise is the key element. The more constraints you have, the more compromise you have to have. But, I personally believe that, when that happens, you have to get more creative, and you end up with something that is even better.
You play a certain way for so long, and change is good. So I look forward to change, and I look forward to playing with the proper talent that we were able to put together.
One of the problems the Republican Party has had is that we're too fast to compromise. You can compromise on the little stuff, but you can't compromise on your core principles.
Even if people just change two or three things that they are able to sustain over time, it makes quite a difference eventually.
No opposing quotes found.