Galvanised into action by the second trial, I was determined to change Britain's archaic sex laws.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I felt grand juries were illegal and coercive.
I was thrown into the Parliament right away. From 1976 to 1978 I was concerned with the abortion issue, later on with that of divorce.
I spent my time trying to understand grand jury procedure - a topic about which I never before had the slightest interest.
The option of solicitor advocacy came on the scene a bit too late for me.
Any law can be changed, obviously, at any time.
Such a prostitution of judicial power can never occur again under the shadow of the British law, for no jury within the wide circle of the empire would submit to such an infraction of their privilege, even if a judge could be found daring enough to attempt it.
I was determined that no British government should be brought down by the action of two tarts.
There is one universal sex law: Sex shall not be unregulated.
I decided law was the exact opposite of sex; even when it was good, it was lousy.
Whatever was the conduct of England, I am equally arraigned.