In foreign policy, there are times when speaking with one voice - and it doesn't have to be mine - allows us to engage better on issues, and enables us to do things more effectively.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Europe should speak more effectively and clearly with one voice in the world.
Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the search for peace and the reformulation of the international system; to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic forces on the planet. This is how Venezuela has presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought a nonpermanent seat on the Security Council.
Management must speak with one voice. When it doesn't management itself becomes a peripheral opponent to the team's mission.
I ask you to find your voice and use it not only to choose your elected officials but to shape the issues that will shape our lives.
When they speak about 'We the people...,' we the people have to have a voice. It can't just be the establishment voice.
There is a need for more effective dialogue... between the government and the international community.
In Israel, there is this reduction of the political discourse to something that is very limited. It's as if you have that pitch that only dogs can hear. Sometimes I feel I speak at such a pitch that very few people around me communicate with what I'm saying.
The American people on the ground need a clearer, stronger, Lyndon B. Johnson-type voice from their president. Obama has that voice. It has to be used.
As you have fewer and fewer voices in a democracy, in a free society, it's not good to limit the number of voices.
When you have a voice, and you have an opportunity at the world level to be able to speak, it has to be right.