If I can get people to accept that a DNA test is nothing to be intimidated about, then we can do tests that determine how well you metabolise certain drugs and test for breast cancer.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
A lot of genetic testing hasn't been integrated into healthcare because it has been expensive. I want to make people realise that they have the ability to be in charge of their own health.
Breast cancer alone kills some 458,000 people each year, according to the World Health Organization, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. It has got to be a priority to ensure that more women can access gene testing and lifesaving preventive treatment, whatever their means and background, wherever they live.
Cities vary widely in the use of DNA testing.
There is a long history of how DNA sequencing can bring certainty to people's lives.
With DNA, the ability to find out a lot more with a lot less has increased our ability for identification.
With DNA, you have to be able to tell which genes are turned on or off. Current DNA sequencing cannot do that. The next generation of DNA sequencing needs to be able to do this. If somebody invents this, then we can start to very precisely identify cures for diseases.
I do not want to die being known for doing baby mama DNA tests on my show.
Accuracy in the genetic field will be essential. Errors in testing could be disastrous.
With breast cancer, it's all about detection. You have to educate young women and encourage them to do everything they have to do.
DNA sequencing opens vast ethical issues. We shall be able to know who has defective genes. What will it mean when we can be sure we're not all born equal? Worked out, the implications will scare a lot of people. Insurance companies will not want to cover those with a genetic predisposition to illness, for example. Here lurk myriad lawsuits.
No opposing quotes found.