I can analyse the trajectory of my popularity and find out why the peak was a peak and the valley was a valley - grapple with it that way - but I prefer not to analyse it that much.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I'm not at a point in my life when I'm analyzing too much.
You'll find a lot of rich detail in people's personal histories - diaries and journals and things of the era.
As far as trying to analyze all the attention I received, I will leave that to others.
While data can only tell you what has happened in the past, it can in some ways give you a sense of what might be of interest to an audience in the future.
I'm not an analyzer. I've got a son that analyzes everything and everybody. But I don't analyze people.
I don't analyze things all the time, I just do them.
There has been much talk referencing what I consider conceptual reports like the Landscape of Choice and documents created as a result of the Great Valley Center.
I spend a great deal of time on research, on finding all the available accounts of a scene or incident, finding out all the background details and the biographies of the people involved there, and I try to run up all the accounts side by side to see where the contradictions are, and to look where things have gone missing.
I usually don't have to do a lot of research in my work, as I'm writing about something I'm already familiar with.
My valleys are higher than most people's peaks. I stay at that level.
No opposing quotes found.