Quote

Where would we be without inhibitions? They're quite useful things when you look at some of the things humans do if they lose them.

That a strong stimulus to such an afferent nerve, exciting most or all of its fibres, should in regard to a given muscle develop inhibition and excitation concurrently is not surprising.

Inhibition is something I notice in hamstrung actors all the time. They can be wonderful up to a point and then become very self-conscious.

Further study of central nervous action, however, finds central inhibition too extensive and ubiquitous to make it likely that it is confined solely to the taxis of antagonistic muscles.

I'm such a control freak, and it's very hard for me to lose my inhibitions without something chemical inside me.

Stimuli, however, do not act upon an indifferent organism.

Action is no less necessary than thought to the instinctive tendencies of the human frame.

The constant flux and caprice of mental events do not admit of the establishment of stable experimental conditions.

The route of expropriation, and especially in energy matters, is not what most promotes investment or generates greater confidence.

As an actress I feel that if you start to impose your own inhibitions, then you are not doing your job.