Architecture has a strong link with the movies in terms of time progression, sequencing, framing, all of that.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
I would say that to put architecture in the chain of history, to be able to interpret and understand why we are where we are, is quite crucial.
In a way, the whole notion of a blueprint of a building is not that different from a script for a movie. A sequence of spaces, which is what you do as an architect, is really the same as a sequence of scenes.
Architecture is the will of an epoch translated into space. Living, Changing, New. Not yesterday, not tomorrow, only today can be given form. Only such architecture is creative.
Seeing architecture differently from the way you see the rest of life is a bit weird. I believe one should be consistent in all that one does, from the books you read to the way you bring up your children. Everything you do is connected.
I don't find Hollywood interesting, so I'm thinking of studying architecture instead.
I don't know why I've always been so captivated by architecture.
Architecture has curled up in a ball and it's about itself. It has found itself either as a freakshow, where you're not sure if it's good or bad but at least it's interesting, or at the behest of forces of commerce.
I believe that architecture, as anything else in life, is evolutionary. Ideas evolve; they don't come from outer space and crash into the drawing board.
The speed of change makes you wonder what will become of architecture.
I think films are bigger than structure.