In New York, everyone's desperate for success, desperate for money and desperate to be accepted, but in London they're more laid back about things like that.
Sentiment: POSITIVE
Places like New York are just too intense, too much about money, too much about ambition; it's all too superficial for me.
To me, the difference between New York and London is that things are boring and staid in London.
Audiences are a wee bit more chatty in New York than in London.
New York is on a grid system, so it's slightly less challenging logistically, but Londoners are more relaxed in their selling approach. With that intense shopping service in New York, it's easy to get carried away and make a wrong purchase. Here, there's a different flow. You are left to explore, and individuality is key.
People say that New Yorkers aren't friendly, but I think they're more friendly than Londoners. Here there is a front-footed nature of Americans. You can go out on a night out and meet 10 random people and stay in touch with them, whereas that's not going to happen in the same way in London.
The first time I went to New York, it was really exciting, and I thought, given half the chance, it would be nice to live there - the same with London.
London is a fantastic creator of jobs - but many of these jobs are going to people who don't originate in this country.
The people in New York want to achieve something; the people in L.A., they just want to achieve success.
Everyone in New York wants to move to London, and everyone in London wants to live in New York. A few people want to live in L.A., but I'll never understand that. It's too much for me.
People are friendlier in New York than London.