I suspect that no community will become humane and caring by restricting what its members can say.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Without a sense of caring, there can be no sense of community.
In societies no less than individuals, acknowledging our limitations may ultimately be more humane than denying them.
Freedom without rules doesn't work. And communities do not work unless they are regulated by etiquette.
These censorship people think something is going to promote behavior in people.
My hope is that we're going to end up with a far more tolerant society, where the erosion of privacy, to the extent it erodes, will be offset by increased tolerance.
When members of this House use inflammatory language, use offensive language, it does not help the process. It is beneath the dignity of this body and this country.
Free speech is a valuable commodity, which we preserve and protect, but there quite rightly is restriction on free speech in the best interest of the good order of the community and common sense.
The problem is going to be finding the right words and implementing it in a way that is really dealing with people that are inciting and not preventing honest discussion of the underlying causes of this horrendous political situation the world is in now.
Communities don't have rights. Only individuals in the community have rights.
Therefore the great mediator of any community is human morality.
No opposing quotes found.