Quote

Just because a couple people on the Supreme Court declare something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so.

Why is it is claimed that if people won't or can't take care of their own needs, that people in government can do it for them?

Just because a majority of the Supreme Court declares something to be 'constitutional' does not make it so.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

The constitution does not provide for first and second class citizens.

A government should not function based on the pressures of some or others. It should try to adapt a mix of measures that fits every context and generates the appropriate steps forward.

As we approached our work, my colleagues and I looked to the U.S. Constitution for guidance. It states, 'No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.' No person, no exceptions.

What's wrong is that we are not participating to make this the type of government it needs to be.

Without the ability to talk about government power, there's no way for citizens to make sure this power isn't being misused.

We don't want the government to have anything we don't have, because government isn't 'We The People' anymore.