Corporations are not people. They shouldn't be funding. They shouldn't be funding campaigns at all.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Corporations are economic entities or structures, and yet they're allowed to fund political candidates, and when those candidates are elected, guess who gets in the door first? It's corporations.
In my view, a corporation is not a person. A corporation does not have First Amendment rights to spend as much money as it wants, without disclosure, on a political campaign.
I don't think we should view corporations as people for the purposes of speech.
Corporations serve an important purpose, but telling people how to vote isn't one of them.
The idea that corporations have the same First Amendment protections of free speech as people is troubling. Corporations are not people. They don't attend our schools, get married and have children. They don't vote in our elections.
The corporations don't have to lobby the government anymore. They are the government.
Corporations aren't people. They have no brains, no consciences, no capacity for intent or guilt.
I don't represent corporations.
The reality is that asking the public to fund political campaigns accomplishes nothing. Candidates continue to seek interest-group support through other channels, both financial and in-kind, and corruption problems abound.
I think we have to look at the whole way campaigns are financed. The No. 1 problem is PAC and special-interest money.
No opposing quotes found.