Simply because you do not have evidence that something exists does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn't exist.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
I'm not an atheist. How can you not believe in something that doesn't exist? That's way too convoluted for me.
In the ordinary affairs of life we do not require nor expect demonstrative evidence, because it is inconsistent with the nature of matters of fact, and to insist on its production would be unreasonable and absurd.
Believing that there is no God does not mean that there isn't one.
Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
In like manner, if I let myself believe anything on insufficient evidence, there may be no great harm done by the mere belief; it may be true after all, or I may never have occasion to exhibit it in outward acts.
What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
I can't prove that God doesn't exist, but I'd much rather live in a universe without one.
Don't be misled by those who claim God doesn't exist, because He does.
The very act of questioning whether you exist proves you do, because you must be there for the doubt to be entertained in the first place.