There is a thin line between politics and theatricals.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
Politics with me isn't theater. It's performance art. Sometimes, for its own sake.
Political theatre presents an entirely different set of problems. Sermonising has to be avoided at all cost. Objectivity is essential. The characters must be allowed to breathe their own air. The author cannot confine and constrict them to satisfy his own taste or disposition or prejudice.
I don't think it's the job of theatre at the moment to provide political propaganda; that would be simplistic. We have to explore our situation further before we will understand it.
The first rule of good theatre is 'Show, don't tell.' It applies to good political action as well.
It's important for me, politically, to see that theater isn't just about the powerful.
Politics in a literary work, is like a gun shot in the middle of a concert, something vulgar, and however, something which is impossible to ignore.
American politics is theatre. There is a frightening emotionalism at national conventions.
I request the audience to not mix cinema with politics.
In politics, it's very theatrical. There's a lot of stage craft. The campaign is trying to tell a story that they want people to believe in, and candidates are playing the role, like actors, by a creative personae that people will be attracted to.
In the theater there is often a tension, almost a contradiction, between the way real people would think and behave, and a kind of imposed dramaticness.
No opposing quotes found.