I know that speaking with parties, which I do, but not very often, is seen by many as a 'contamination.'
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
It is correct that I overlooked the contamination of the party, not just now but also in the past.
In my experience of these things, parties which shout about dirty tricks and the like tend to do so because they fear a direct hit in some vulnerable part of their political anatomy.
In real life I avoid all parties altogether, but on paper I can mingle with the best of them.
I couldn't have attended half the parties that I was supposed to have been to according to the newspapers. It bothers me.
Well, many of us believe that excessive media concentration is a subject that ought to be addressed, and it is, of course, the intention of the majority party not to allow that to be discussed.
I don't throw a lot of parties. I find throwing parties a bit intimidating.
There's so much mudslinging going on, and people get so turned off by that. It seems like neither party is aware of that. They're too concerned with blasting each other.
The whole sector of public dialogue has been totally contaminated, deliberately, by the corporate sector. The whole purpose is to sow confusion and doubt, and it's worked.
I think Freud is about contamination, but I think that is something he learned from Shakespeare, because Shakespeare is about nothing but contamination, you might say.
I know that every time I list something that I am, I am potentially alienating a whole group of people. Publicists and managers will encourage you not to say what political party you belong to, what you eat, what you don't eat, who you sleep with and all that stuff.
No opposing quotes found.