Very rarely do firearms restrictions affect criminals. They really only affect law-abiding citizens.
Sentiment: NEGATIVE
I believe that restricting the rights of law-abiding gun owners will not prevent a deranged individual or criminal from obtaining and misusing firearms to commit violence.
I don't believe there should be any restrictions when it comes to firearms. None.
I truly believe that firearms in the hands of law abiding citizen's makes our families and our communities more safe, not less safe.
That guns do more than protect us from criminals; more importantly, they protect us from the ongoing threat of government.
There's no evidence that I'm aware of that guns reduce crime.
Obviously, we think it's important to make sure that firearms do not get in the hands of people who are criminals, convicted felons or adjudicated as mentally ill.
In the myopic world of the liberals, guns are responsible for evil instead of the perpetrator of evil. But criminals are not bound by our laws. That's what makes them criminals.
Carrying a concealed weapon is a sign of self-defense, self-protection, and I think it lowers crime.
Clearly, a large number of people who shouldn't have firearms actually apply through the process and obtain firearms.
The world is filled with violence. Because criminals carry guns, we decent law-abiding citizens should also have guns. Otherwise they will win and the decent people will loose.
No opposing quotes found.